Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

18 questions · 21 findings · 3 reviews

No studies found 1 · 4.8%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 4.8%Moderate 10 · 47.6%High 9 · 42.9%

Factor Xa inhibitors vs Anticoagulants

Major bleeding · Anticoagulants in ACS

Factor Xa inhibitors showed no clear difference in major bleeding at 30 days compared with anticoagulants (high certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Factor Xa inhibitors vs Anticoagulants

Minor bleeding · Anticoagulants in ACS

Factor Xa inhibitors showed no clear difference in minor bleeding at 30 days compared with anticoagulants (high certainty).

3 findings from 1 review

Oral factor Xa inhibitors vs conventional anticoagulation

Non‐fatal PE (3 to 12 months) · participants with diagnosed DVT

Oral factor Xa inhibitors showed no clear difference in non‐fatal PE (3 to 12 months) compared with conventional anticoagulation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral factor Xa inhibitors vs conventional anticoagulation

All‐cause mortality (3 to 6 months) · participants with diagnosed DVT

Oral factor Xa inhibitors showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality (3 to 6 months) compared with conventional anticoagulation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral factor Xa inhibitors vs conventional anticoagulation

Recurrent DVT (3 to 12 months) · participants with diagnosed DVT

Oral factor Xa inhibitors showed no clear difference in recurrent DVT (3 to 12 months) compared with conventional anticoagulation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral factor Xa inhibitors vs conventional anticoagulation

Fatal PE (3 to 12 months) · participants with diagnosed DVT

Oral factor Xa inhibitors showed no clear difference in fatal PE (3 to 12 months) compared with conventional anticoagulation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral factor Xa inhibitors vs conventional anticoagulation

All‐cause mortality · patients with a pulmonary embolism, confirmed by standard imaging techniques

Oral factor Xa inhibitors showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality compared with conventional anticoagulation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral factor Xa inhibitors vs conventional anticoagulation

Major bleedinge · patients with a pulmonary embolism, confirmed by standard imaging techniques

Oral factor Xa inhibitors showed no clear difference in major bleedinge compared with conventional anticoagulation (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral factor Xa inhibitors vs conventional anticoagulation

Recurrent PE · patients with a pulmonary embolism, confirmed by standard imaging techniques

Oral factor Xa inhibitors showed no clear difference in recurrent PEa compared with conventional anticoagulation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral factor Xa inhibitors vs conventional anticoagulation

Recurrent VTEc · patients with a pulmonary embolism, confirmed by standard imaging techniques

Oral factor Xa inhibitors showed no clear difference in recurrent VTEc compared with conventional anticoagulation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral factor Xa inhibitors vs conventional anticoagulation

DVTd · patients with a pulmonary embolism, confirmed by standard imaging techniques

Oral factor Xa inhibitors showed no clear difference in DVTd compared with conventional anticoagulation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review