Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 33.3%Low 1 · 33.3%Moderate 1 · 33.3%High 0 · 0%

Extended‐field radiotherapy vs pelvic radiotherapy

Para‐aortic lymph node recurrence

Extended‐field radiotherapy probably leads to lower para‐aortic lymph node recurrence compared with pelvic radiotherapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Extended‐field radiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.36 [0.18, 0.7]
2 studies · 477 participants
Moderate

Extended‐field radiotherapy vs pelvic chemoradiotherapy

Para‐aortic lymph node recurrence

Extended‐field radiotherapy may leads to lower para‐aortic lymph node recurrence compared with pelvic chemoradiotherapy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Extended‐field radiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.44 [0.2, 0.99]
1 study · 389 participants
Low

Extended‐field chemoradiotherapy vs pelvic chemoradiotherapy

Para‐aortic lymph node recurrence

It is very uncertain whether extended‐field chemoradiotherapy changes para‐aortic lymph node recurrence compared with pelvic chemoradiotherapy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Extended‐field radiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.19 [0.02, 1.54]
1 study · 74 participants
Very low