What do systematic reviews say?

Parenteral nutrition with omega‐3 fish oil vs parenteral nutrition

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 36 participants
  Very low

Parenteral nutrition with omega‐3 fish oil vs parenteral nutrition

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 36 participants
  Very low

Parenteral nutrition with omega‐3 fish oil vs parenteral nutrition

It is very uncertain whether parenteral nutrition with omega‐3 fish oil changes acute rejection episodes compared with standard parenteral nutrition (very low certainty).

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 1 [0.17, 5.77]
  1 study · 36 participants
  Very low

Parenteral nutrition with omega‐3 fish oil vs parenteral nutrition

It is very uncertain whether parenteral nutrition with omega‐3 fish oil changes mortality compared with standard parenteral nutrition (very low certainty).

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 36 participants
  Very low

Postoperative feeding via nasojejunal tube vs postoperative parenteral nutrition (PN)

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 24 participants
  Very low

Postoperative feeding via nasojejunal tube vs postoperative parenteral nutrition (PN)

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 24 participants
  Very low

Postoperative feeding via nasojejunal tube vs postoperative parenteral nutrition (PN)

It is very uncertain whether postoperative enteral nutrition (Osmolite) via nasojejunal tube changes mortality compared with postoperative parenteral nutrition (PN) (very low certainty).

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 0.7 [0.01, 60.29]
  1 study · 24 participants
  Very low

Postoperative feeding via nasojejunal tube vs postoperative parenteral nutrition (PN)

It is very uncertain whether postoperative enteral nutrition (Osmolite) via nasojejunal tube changes side effects (vomiting, diarrhoea) compared with postoperative parenteral nutrition (PN) (very low certainty).

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 0.68 [0.04, 11.17]
  1 study · 24 participants
  Very low

Postoperative feeding via nasojejunal tube vs postoperative parenteral nutrition (PN)

It is very uncertain whether postoperative enteral nutrition (Osmolite) via nasojejunal tube changes infection (overall) compared with postoperative parenteral nutrition (PN) (very low certainty).

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 1.07 [0.12, 8.75]
  1 study · 24 participants
  Very low

Enteral nutrition via nasojejunal tube plus intravenous glutamine‐dipeptide supplementation vs parenteral nutrition

It is very uncertain whether enteral nutrition via nasojejunal tube plus intravenous… changes death (during length of initial hospital stay; ITT) compared with standard parenteral nutrition (very low certainty).

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 30 participants
  Very low

Enteral nutrition via nasojejunal tube plus intravenous glutamine‐dipeptide supplementation vs parenteral nutrition

It is very uncertain whether enteral nutrition via nasojejunal tube plus intravenous… changes infection (ITT) ‐ mycotic infection compared with standard parenteral nutrition (very low certainty).

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 0.19 [0.02, 1.31]
  1 study · 30 participants
  Very low

Enteral nutrition via nasojejunal tube plus intravenous glutamine‐dipeptide supplementation vs parenteral nutrition

It is very uncertain whether enteral nutrition via nasojejunal tube plus intravenous… changes infection (ITT) ‐ infection (overall) compared with standard parenteral nutrition (very low certainty).

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 0.35 [0.06, 1.84]
  1 study · 30 participants
  Very low

Enteral nutrition via nasojejunal tube plus intravenous glutamine‐dipeptide supplementation vs parenteral nutrition

It is very uncertain whether enteral nutrition via nasojejunal tube plus intravenous… changes acute rejection (ITT) compared with standard parenteral nutrition (very low certainty).

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 0.21 [0.004, 2.49]
  1 study · 30 participants
  Very low

Enteral nutrition via nasojejunal tube plus intravenous glutamine‐dipeptide supplementation vs parenteral nutrition

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 30 participants
  Very low

Enteral nutrition via nasojejunal tube plus intravenous glutamine‐dipeptide supplementation vs parenteral nutrition

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 30 participants
  Very low

Enteral nutrition via nasojejunal tube plus intravenous glutamine‐dipeptide supplementation vs parenteral nutrition

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 30 participants
  Very low

Standard parenteral nutrition vs standard isotonic intravenous glucose solution

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 18 participants
  Low
• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 18 participants
  Low

Standard parenteral nutrition vs standard isotonic intravenous glucose solution

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 18 participants
  Low

Standard parenteral nutrition vs standard isotonic intravenous glucose solution

Standard parenteral nutrition may leads to lower mortality [within first 10 weeks after liver transplantation] compared with standard isotonic intravenous glucose solution (low certainty).

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 18 participants
  Low

Parenteral nutrition plus branched‐chain‐amino‐acid‐enriched formula vs standard isotonic intravenous glucose solution

• Nutritional interventions for liver‐transplanted patients 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 20 participants
  Low