Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

6 questions · 12 findings · 1 reviews · Vascular

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1 · 8.3%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 3 · 25%Moderate 8 · 66.7%High 0 · 0%

Endovascular revascularisation vs no therapy

Maximum walking distance · intermittent claudication

2 findings from 1 review

Endovascular revascularisation versus conservative management for intermittent claudication 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 125 participants
Moderate
Endovascular revascularisation versus conservative management for intermittent claudication 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 103 participants
Low

Endovascular revascularisation vs conservative therapy

Pain‐free walking distance · intermittent claudication

2 findings from 1 review

Endovascular revascularisation versus conservative management for intermittent claudication 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 147 participants
Moderate
Endovascular revascularisation versus conservative management for intermittent claudication 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
5 studies · 345 participants
Moderate

Endovascular revascularisation vs no therapy

Pain‐free walking distance · intermittent claudication

2 findings from 1 review

Endovascular revascularisation versus conservative management for intermittent claudication 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 125 participants
Moderate
Endovascular revascularisation versus conservative management for intermittent claudication 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 103 participants
Low

Endovascular revascularisation vs conservative therapy

Maximum walking distance · intermittent claudication

2 findings from 1 review

Endovascular revascularisation versus conservative management for intermittent claudication 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
5 studies · 345 participants
Moderate
Endovascular revascularisation versus conservative management for intermittent claudication 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 184 participants
Moderate

Endovascular revascularisation plus conservative therapy vs conservative therapy

Maximum walking distance · intermittent claudication

2 findings from 1 review

Endovascular revascularisation versus conservative management for intermittent claudication 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 432 participants
Moderate
Endovascular revascularisation versus conservative management for intermittent claudication 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 106 participants
Low

Endovascular revascularisation plus conservative therapy vs conservative therapy

Pain‐free walking distance · intermittent claudication

2 findings from 1 review

Endovascular revascularisation versus conservative management for intermittent claudication 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 305 participants
Moderate
Endovascular revascularisation versus conservative management for intermittent claudication 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found