Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

7 questions · 7 findings · 1 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 4 · 57.1%Moderate 3 · 42.9%High 0 · 0%

Closest answers

The findings closest to your search, judged one by one by TypeSafe's Jev model.

Direct match · question page
- Endometrial resection/ablation vs unspecified (or at surgeon's discretion) route of hysterectomy · Effectiveness Proportion of women with perception of improvement of bleeding symptoms
  Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.89 [0.83, 0.95]
  2 studies · 403 participants
  Low
Direct match · question page
- Endometrial resection/ablation vs unspecified (or at surgeon's discretion) route of hysterectomy · Requirement for further surgery for treatment failure
  Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 374 participants
  Moderate
Direct match · question page
- Endometrial resection/ablation vs unspecified (or at surgeon's discretion) route of hysterectomy · Safety Any serious adverse event
  Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.21 [0.06, 0.8]
  2 studies · 374 participants
  Moderate
Direct match · question page
- Endometrial resection/ablation vs unspecified (or at surgeon's discretion) route of hysterectomy · Quality of life SF‐36 general health perception
  Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 209 participants
  Low
Direct match · question page
- Endometrial resection/ablation vs unspecified (or at surgeon's discretion) route of hysterectomy · Acceptability Proportion satisfied with treatment
  Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.96 [0.88, 1.04]
  3 studies · 545 participants
  Moderate

Endometrial resection or ablation vs unspecified (or at surgeon's discretion) route of hysterectomy

Effectiveness Proportion of women with perception of improvement of bleeding symptoms · heavy menstrual bleeding

Endometrial resection/ablation may leads to lower effectiveness Proportion of women with perception of improvement of… compared with unspecified (or at surgeon's discretion) route of hysterectomy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.89 [0.83, 0.95]
2 studies · 403 participants
Low

Endometrial resection or ablation vs unspecified (or at surgeon's discretion) route of hysterectomy

Quality of life SF‐36 at 2 years – general health perception · heavy menstrual bleeding

1 finding from 1 review

Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 209 participants
Low

Endometrial resection or ablation vs unspecified (or at surgeon's discretion) route of hysterectomy

Proportion with improvement in general health · heavy menstrual bleeding

Endometrial resection/ablation may leads to lower proportion with improvement in general health compared with unspecified (or at surgeon's discretion) route of hysterectomy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.85 [0.77, 0.95]
1 study · 185 participants
Low

Endometrial resection or ablation vs unspecified (or at surgeon's discretion) route of hysterectomy

Requirement for further surgery for treatment failure · heavy menstrual bleeding

1 finding from 1 review

Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 374 participants
Moderate

Endometrial resection or ablation vs unspecified (or at surgeon's discretion) route of hysterectomy

Acceptability Proportion satisfied with treatment · heavy menstrual bleeding

Endometrial resection/ablation showed no clear difference in acceptability Proportion satisfied with treatment compared with unspecified (or at surgeon's discretion) route of hysterectomy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.96 [0.88, 1.04]
3 studies · 545 participants
Moderate

Endometrial resection or ablation vs unspecified (or at surgeon's discretion) route of hysterectomy

Safety Any serious adverse event · heavy menstrual bleeding

Endometrial resection/ablation probably leads to lower safety Any serious adverse event compared with unspecified (or at surgeon's discretion) route of hysterectomy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.21 [0.06, 0.8]
2 studies · 374 participants
Moderate

Endometrial resection or ablation vs unspecified (or at surgeon's discretion) route of hysterectomy

Return to normal activity · heavy menstrual bleeding

1 finding from 1 review

Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 172 participants
Low