Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 2 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 33.3%Low 2 · 66.7%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Endometrial injury vs control

Clinical pregnancy per woman randomised: sensitivity analysis (no high‐risk) · women undergoing assisted reproduction

Endometrial injury showed no clear difference in clinical pregnancy per woman randomised: sensitivity analysis (no… compared with control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Endometrial injury in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF) 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.16 [0.67, 2.02]
1 study · 229 participants
Low

Endometrial injury vs control

Clinical pregnancy · women undergoing assisted reproduction

1 finding from 1 review

Endometrial injury in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF) 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
37 studies · 8786 participants
Very low

Intentional endometrial injury vs no intervention or a sham procedure

Clinical pregnancy · infertile women or couples attempting to conceive through sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination (IUI)

Intentional endometrial injury may leads to higher clinical pregnancy (sensitivity analysis) compared with no intervention or a sham procedure (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Endometrial injury for pregnancy following sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 2.02 [1.67, 2.45]
19 studies · 3184 participants
Low