Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

54 questions · 67 findings · 6 reviews

No studies found 24 · 35.8%GRADE not reported 15 · 22.4%Very low 20 · 29.9%Low 8 · 11.9%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ultrasound during vertical distraction osteogenesis vs Placebo (no ultrasound) during vertical distraction

Distraction distance (bone gain, mm) · Patients with vertically deficient posterior/anterior mandibular ridges needing implants

Ultrasound during vertical distraction osteogenesis showed no clear difference in distraction distance (bone gain, mm) compared with placebo (no ultrasound) during vertical distraction; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Virtual reality distraction vs non‐VR distraction

Acute pain · children (0 to 18 years)
5 findings from 1 review
Show 2 more findings

Virtual reality distraction vs other VR distraction

Acute pain · children (0‐18 years)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

5 findings from 1 review
Show 2 more findings

Virtual reality distraction vs no distraction

Acute pain · children (0 to 18 years)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

5 findings from 1 review
Show 2 more findings

Maxillary distraction osteogenesis vs Orthognathic surgery (conventional Le Fort I osteotomy)

Long-term skeletal relapse/stability (horizontal movement of A-point) · Adolescents or adults (15 years or older) with an established diagnosis of complete cleft lip and alveolar process, or complete unilateral…

It is very uncertain whether maxillary distraction osteogenesis changes long-term skeletal relapse/stability (horizontal movement of A-point) compared with orthognathic surgery (conventional Le Fort I osteotomy) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Maxillary distraction osteogenesis vs Orthognathic surgery (conventional Le Fort I osteotomy)

Speech: resonance (hypernasality) (deterioration/improvement) · Adolescents or adults (15 years or older) with an established diagnosis of complete cleft lip and alveolar process, or complete unilateral…

It is very uncertain whether maxillary distraction osteogenesis changes speech: resonance (hypernasality) (deterioration/improvement) compared with orthognathic surgery (conventional Le Fort I osteotomy) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Maxillary distraction osteogenesis vs Orthognathic surgery (conventional Le Fort I osteotomy)

Clinical morbidities (adverse effects) · Adolescents or adults (15 years or older) with an established diagnosis of complete cleft lip and alveolar process, or complete unilateral…
1 finding from 1 review

Maxillary distraction osteogenesis vs Orthognathic surgery (conventional Le Fort I osteotomy)

Psychological status: social self-esteem (Culture-Free Self-Esteem Inventory subset); also general self-esteem and Social Avoidance and Distress Scale · Adolescents or adults (15 years or older) with an established diagnosis of complete cleft lip and alveolar process, or complete unilateral…
1 finding from 1 review