evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

12 questions · 12 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 6 · 50%GRADE not reported 1 · 8.3%Very low 5 · 41.7%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Direct vision entry vs Veress needle entry

Vascular injury (major vessels and abdominal wall vessels) · patients undergoing laparoscopy

It is very uncertain whether direct vision entry changes vascular injury (major vessels and abdominal wall vessels) compared with veress needle entry (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Direct vision entry vs Veress needle entry

Visceral injury (bladder or bowel) · patients undergoing laparoscopy

It is very uncertain whether direct vision entry changes visceral injury (bladder or bowel) compared with veress needle entry (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Direct vision entry vs open‐entry technique

Visceral injury (bladder or bowel) · patients undergoing laparoscopy

It is very uncertain whether direct vision entry changes visceral injury (bladder or bowel) compared with open‐entry technique (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Direct vision entry vs open‐entry technique

Solid organ injury · patients undergoing laparoscopy

It is very uncertain whether direct vision entry changes solid organ injury compared with open‐entry technique (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Direct vision entry vs open‐entry technique

Failed entry · patients undergoing laparoscopy

It is very uncertain whether direct vision entry changes failed entry compared with open‐entry technique (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review