evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

2 questions · 2 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 50%Low 1 · 50%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs standard skin care or no skin care intervention

Health service utilization ‐ Clinic attendance for STI/HIV testing · Adolescents and youth age 14 to 24 years

It is very uncertain whether digital targeted client communication via mobile devices changes health service utilization ‐ Clinic attendance for STI/HIV testing compared with standard care or no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices vs digital, non‐targeted communication

Health service utilization ‐ Clinic attendance for STI/HIV testing · Adolescents and youth age 14 to 24 years

Digital targeted client communication via mobile devices may leads to higher health service utilization ‐ Clinic attendance for STI/HIV testing… compared with digital, non‐targeted communication (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review