Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2 questions · 2 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1 · 50%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 50%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Computerised antenatal CTG vs traditional antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complications)

Caesarean section · Pregnant women with/without complications

Computerised antenatal CTG showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with traditional antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complications) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.87 [0.61, 1.24]
1 study · 59 participants
Low

Computerised antenatal CTG vs traditional antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complications)

Caesarean section for non‐reassuring or abnormal fetal heart rate patterns · Pregnant women with/without complications

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found