Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 1 reviews

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 3 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Restoration failure · Children with carious primary teeth

No comparative effect estimate was reported; compomer had more favorable retention in the review narrative.

1 finding from 1 review

Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious primary teeth without pulp therapy: a… 2022 All outcomes
1 year · University · Class II
Annual failure rate (%) compomer 3.6%; HVGIC 25.6% and 13.4%
1 study · 63 participants
GRADE not reported

Restoration failure · Children with carious primary teeth

No comparative effect estimate was reported; both arms had 1.7% failure.

1 finding from 1 review

Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious primary teeth without pulp therapy: a… 2022 All outcomes
1 year · University · Class I, II, III, and V
Annual failure rate (%) compomer 1.7%; composite resin 1.7%
1 study · 36 participants
GRADE not reported

Restoration failure · Children with carious primary teeth

No comparative effect estimate was reported; the review described comparable survival.

1 finding from 1 review

Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious primary teeth without pulp therapy: a… 2022 All outcomes
1 year · Not reported · Class II
Annual failure rate (%) Compoglass F 4.3%; Twinky Star 7.0%
1 study · 98 participants
GRADE not reported