evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

5 questions · 5 findings · 1 reviews · Heart

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 5 · 100%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Complete revascularisation vs culprit‐only revascularisation

Long‐term all‐cause mortality (≥ 1 year after the intervention) · people with STEMI and MVD.

It is very uncertain whether complete revascularisation changes long‐term all‐cause mortality (≥ 1 year after the intervention) compared with culprit‐only revascularisation (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Complete revascularisation vs culprit‐only revascularisation

Cardiovascular mortality · people with STEMI and MVD.

It is very uncertain whether complete revascularisation changes long‐term cardiovascular mortality (≥ 1 year after the intervention) compared with culprit‐only revascularisation (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Complete revascularisation vs culprit‐only revascularisation

Myocardial infarction · people with STEMI and MVD.

It is very uncertain whether complete revascularisation changes long‐term myocardial infarction (≥ 1 year after the intervention) compared with culprit‐only revascularisation (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Complete revascularisation vs culprit‐only revascularisation

Overall adverse events (pooled short and long term) · people with STEMI and MVD.

It is very uncertain whether complete revascularisation changes overall adverse events (pooled short and long term) compared with culprit‐only revascularisation (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Complete revascularisation vs culprit‐only revascularisation

Long‐term revascularisation (≥ 1 year after the intervention) · people with STEMI and MVD.

It is very uncertain whether complete revascularisation changes long‐term revascularisation (≥ 1 year after the intervention) compared with culprit‐only revascularisation (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review