Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

11 questions · 13 findings · 2 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 3 · 23.1%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 5 · 38.5%Low 2 · 15.4%Moderate 3 · 23.1%High 0 · 0%

Comparison 6: Remote contact interventions vs treatment

Telephone contact vs TAU · adults who engage in SH

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Psychosocial interventions for self‐harm in adults 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Comparison 6: Remote contact interventions vs treatment

Postcards vs TAU · adults who engage in SH

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Psychosocial interventions for self‐harm in adults 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Comparison 6: Remote contact interventions vs treatment

Repetition of SH at post‐intervention · adults who engage in SH

It is very uncertain whether comparison 6: Remote contact interventions changes repetition of SH at post‐intervention compared with treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Psychosocial interventions for self‐harm in adults 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.87 [0.62, 1.23]
4 studies · 3277 participants
Very low

Comparison 6: Remote contact interventions vs treatment

Repetition of SH at 12 months · adults who engage in SH

Comparison 6: Remote contact interventions showed no clear difference in repetition of SH at 12 months compared with treatment (moderate certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Psychosocial interventions for self‐harm in adults 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.76 [0.57, 1.02]
2 studies · 2885 participants
Moderate
Psychosocial interventions for self‐harm in adults 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.19 [0.85, 1.67]
1 study · 827 participants
Moderate

Comparison 6: Remote contact interventions vs treatment

Repetition of SH at final · adults who engage in SH

It is very uncertain whether comparison 6: Remote contact interventions changes repetition of SH at final compared with treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Psychosocial interventions for self‐harm in adults 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.88 [0.62, 1.25]
4 studies · 3277 participants
Very low

Comparison 6: Remote contact interventions vs treatment

Frequency of SH at post‐intervention · adults who engage in SH

1 finding from 1 review

Psychosocial interventions for self‐harm in adults 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 1097 participants
Very low

Comparison 6: Remote contact interventions vs treatment

Frequency of SH at 12 months · adults who engage in SH

2 findings from 1 review

Psychosocial interventions for self‐harm in adults 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 984 participants
Very low
Psychosocial interventions for self‐harm in adults 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 472 participants
Moderate

Comparison 6: Remote contact interventions vs treatment

Emergency cards vs TAU · adults who engage in SH

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Psychosocial interventions for self‐harm in adults 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Comparison 6: Remote contact interventions vs treatment

Repetition of SH at 6 months' · adults who engage in SH

Comparison 6: Remote contact interventions showed no clear difference in repetition of SH at 6 months' compared with treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Psychosocial interventions for self‐harm in adults 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.23 [0.02, 2.11]
1 study · 81 participants
Low

Comparison 6: Remote contact interventions vs treatment

Repetition of SH at 24 months · adults who engage in SH

Comparison 6: Remote contact interventions showed no clear difference in repetition of SH at 24 months' compared with treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Psychosocial interventions for self‐harm in adults 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.76 [0.49, 1.16]
1 study · 605 participants
Low

Comparison 6: Remote contact interventions vs treatment

Repetition of SH at 12 months · children and adolescents who engage in SH.

It is very uncertain whether comparison 9: remote contact interventions changes repetition of SH at 12 months compared with treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for self‐harm in children and adolescents 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.5 [0.12, 2.04]
1 study · 105 participants
Very low