Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

7 questions · 9 findings · 2 reviews · Work

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 3 · 33.3%Low 3 · 33.3%Moderate 3 · 33.3%High 0 · 0%

Combined interventions vs no intervention

Re‐employment Measured as percentage or number of participants who obtained paid employment · Unemployed job seekers

Combined interventions probably leads to higher re‐employment Measured as percentage or number of participants who… compared with no intervention (moderate certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Health‐improving interventions for obtaining employment in unemployed job seekers 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.12 [1.06, 1.2]
6 studies · 4101 participants
Moderate
Health‐improving interventions for obtaining employment in unemployed job seekers 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.18 [0.78, 1.79]
1 study · 66 participants
Very low

Combined interventions vs usual care

Proportion of participants returning to work in the short term (up to 6 months) · patients with coronary heart disease

Combined interventions may leads to higher proportion of participants returning to work in the short term (up… compared with usual care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to support return to work for people with coronary heart disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.56 [1.23, 1.98]
4 studies · 395 participants
Low

Combined interventions vs usual care

Proportion of participants returning to work in the medium term (6 months ‐ 1 year) · patients with coronary heart disease

Combined interventions showed no clear difference in proportion of participants returning to work in the medium term (6… compared with usual care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to support return to work for people with coronary heart disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.06 [1, 1.13]
10 studies · 992 participants
Low

Combined interventions vs usual care

Return to work · patients with coronary heart disease

It is very uncertain whether combined interventions changes proportion of participants at work in the long term (> 1 to < 5 years) compared with usual care (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Interventions to support return to work for people with coronary heart disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.14 [0.96, 1.37]
6 studies · 491 participants
Very low
Interventions to support return to work for people with coronary heart disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 181 participants
Moderate

Combined interventions vs usual care

Proportion of participants at work in the extended long term (≥ 5 years) · patients with coronary heart disease

It is very uncertain whether combined interventions changes proportion of participants at work in the extended long term (≥ 5… compared with usual care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to support return to work for people with coronary heart disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.09 [0.86, 1.38]
4 studies · 350 participants
Very low

Combined interventions vs usual care

Health‐related quality of life · patients with coronary heart disease

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to support return to work for people with coronary heart disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 87 participants
Low

Combined interventions vs usual care

Adverse effects: reinfarctions · patients with coronary heart disease

Combined interventions showed no clear difference in adverse effects: reinfarctions compared with usual care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to support return to work for people with coronary heart disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.56 [0.23, 1.43]
3 studies · 265 participants
Moderate