Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4 questions · 4 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 25%Low 3 · 75%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Clindamycin plus aminoglycoside vs other regimens

Treatment failure ‐ lincosamides versus cephalosporins · women with postpartum endometritis

Clindamycin plus aminoglycoside may leads to lower treatment failure ‐ lincosamides versus cephalosporins compared with any other regimen (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Antibiotic regimens for postpartum endometritis 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.69 [0.49, 0.99]
8 studies · 872 participants
Low

Clindamycin plus aminoglycoside vs other regimens

Severe complication ‐ lincosamides versus cephalosporins · women with postpartum endometritis

It is very uncertain whether clindamycin plus aminoglycoside changes severe complication ‐ lincosamides versus cephalosporins compared with any other regimen (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Antibiotic regimens for postpartum endometritis 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 2.4 [0.3, 19.19]
4 studies · 476 participants
Very low

Clindamycin plus aminoglycoside vs other regimens

Wound infection · women with postpartum endometritis

Clindamycin plus aminoglycoside may leads to lower wound infection ‐ lincosamides versus cephalosporins compared with any other regimen (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Antibiotic regimens for postpartum endometritis 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.53 [0.3, 0.93]
4 studies · 500 participants
Low

Clindamycin plus aminoglycoside vs other regimens

Allergic reaction · women with postpartum endometritis

Clindamycin plus aminoglycoside showed no clear difference in allergic reaction ‐ lincosamides versus cephalosporins compared with any other regimen (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Antibiotic regimens for postpartum endometritis 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.36 [0.44, 4.21]
6 studies · 680 participants
Low