Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

383 questions · 397 findings · 37 reviews

No studies found 59 · 14.9%GRADE not reported 11 · 2.8%Very low 70 · 17.6%Low 86 · 21.7%Moderate 110 · 27.7%High 61 · 15.4%

EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone

Grade 3 to 4 rash · treatment of relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer

It is very uncertain whether EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) plus chemotherapy changes toxicity: grade 3 or 4 rash compared with chemotherapy alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone

Toxicity: grade 3 or 4 nausea ± vomiting · treatment of relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer

It is very uncertain whether EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) plus chemotherapy changes toxicity: grade 3 or 4 nausea ± vomiting compared with chemotherapy alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone

Toxicity: grade 3 or 4 fatigue · treatment of relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer

It is very uncertain whether EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) plus chemotherapy changes toxicity: grade 3 or 4 fatigue compared with chemotherapy alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone

Toxicity: cardiac toxicity (any grade) · treatment of relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer

EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) plus chemotherapy showed no clear difference in toxicity: cardiac toxicity (any grade) compared with chemotherapy alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Platin‐based maintenance chemotherapy vs observation

Progression‐free survival · patients with epithelial ovarian cancer

Platin‐based maintenance chemotherapy showed no clear difference in 3‐year PFS compared with observation (moderate certainty).

3 findings from 1 review

Chemotherapy with bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab maintenance vs chemotherapy alone

Overall survival (OS) · platinum‐sensitive recurrent EOC

Chemotherapy with bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab maintenance showed no clear difference in overall survival (OS) compared with chemotherapy alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chemotherapy with bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab maintenance vs chemotherapy alone

Progression‐free survival · newly‐diagnosed EOC

It is very uncertain whether chemotherapy with bevacizumab followed by maintenance bevacizumab changes progression‐free survival (PFS) compared with chemotherapy alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chemotherapy with bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab maintenance vs chemotherapy alone

Progression‐free survival · platinum‐sensitive recurrent EOC

Chemotherapy with bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab maintenance probably leads to lower progression‐free survival (PFS) compared with chemotherapy alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chemotherapy with bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab maintenance vs chemotherapy alone

Adverse events (grade ≥ 3) · platinum‐sensitive recurrent EOC

Chemotherapy with bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab maintenance leads to higher any adverse event (grade ≥3) compared with chemotherapy alone (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Chemotherapy with bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab maintenance vs chemotherapy alone

Adverse events (grade ≥ 3) · newly‐diagnosed EOC

Chemotherapy with bevacizumab followed by maintenance bevacizumab probably leads to higher any adverse event grade ≥ 3 compared with chemotherapy alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review