Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

5 questions · 5 findings · 1 reviews · Oral Health

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 5 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Chemically cured glass ionomer cement vs Chemically cured glass phosphonate

Taste preference (patient preference) · Patients with full arch fixed orthodontic appliances with bands attached to molars (patients with cleft lip/palate or other craniofacial…

1 finding from 1 review

Adhesives for fixed orthodontic bands 2016 · Cochrane All outcomes
Approximately 12 months (to end of treatment)
Clark 2003: no statistically significant difference in taste between the two cements (glass ionomer vs glass phosphonate); authors caution the finding because both cements were used at the same sitting, so the taste of…
1 study
GRADE not reported

Chemically cured glass ionomer cement vs Chemically cured glass phosphonate

Band failure (band adhesive loosening) · Patients with full arch fixed orthodontic appliances with bands attached to molars (patients with cleft lip/palate or other craniofacial…

1 finding from 1 review

Adhesives for fixed orthodontic bands 2016 · Cochrane All outcomes
Approximately 12 months (to end of treatment)
Clark 2003: failure rates presented per adhesive group by number of bands failing (overall proportion of band failure 0.048 for each material); no per-patient failure data. Low band failure rates; insufficient evidence…
1 study
GRADE not reported

Chemically cured glass ionomer cement vs Light-cured compomer (polyacid-modified composite resin)

Taste preference (patient preference) · Patients with full arch fixed orthodontic appliances with bands attached to molars (patients with cleft lip/palate or other craniofacial…

1 finding from 1 review

Adhesives for fixed orthodontic bands 2016 · Cochrane All outcomes
Approximately 12 months (to end of treatment)
Williams 2005 (30 participants): a statistically significant difference in patient taste preference in favour of the glass ionomer over the light-cured composite resin (compomer).
1 study · 30 participants
GRADE not reported

Chemically cured glass ionomer cement vs Light-cured compomer (polyacid-modified composite resin)

Decalcification · Patients with full arch fixed orthodontic appliances with bands attached to molars (patients with cleft lip/palate or other craniofacial…

1 finding from 1 review

Adhesives for fixed orthodontic bands 2016 · Cochrane All outcomes
Approximately 12 months (to end of treatment)
Gillgrass 2001 (98 participants): comparison of change in mean enamel white spot lesion scores during treatment showed no statistically significant difference between chemically cured glass ionomer and light-cured…
1 study · 98 participants
GRADE not reported

Chemically cured glass ionomer cement vs Light-cured compomer (polyacid-modified composite resin)

Band failure (band adhesive loosening) · Patients with full arch fixed orthodontic appliances with bands attached to molars (patients with cleft lip/palate or other craniofacial…

1 finding from 1 review

Adhesives for fixed orthodontic bands 2016 · Cochrane All outcomes
Approximately 12 months (to end of treatment)
No meta-analysis. Fricker 1997: failure data not presented in an analysable format (number of bands or failures per person not given). Gillgrass 2001 (98 participants; 140 band pairs): 4 single-band failures with…
3 studies
GRADE not reported