Participant‐reported scar improvement (short‐term) · people with acne scars
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Investigator‐assessed adverse events (short‐term) · people with acne scars
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Participant‐assessed adverse events (short‐term) · people with acne scars
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Participant‐reported scar improvement (short‐term) · people with acne scars
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Investigator‐assessed adverse events (short‐term) · people with acne scars
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Participant‐assessed adverse events (short‐term) N of participants with adverse events · people with acne scars
It is very uncertain whether chemical peeling changes participant‐assessed adverse events (short‐term) N of participants… compared with combined chemical peeling plus any active intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Participant‐reported scar improvement (short‐term) N of participants with > 50% improvement in acne scars · people with acne scars
It is very uncertain whether chemical peeling changes participant‐reported scar improvement (short‐term) N of participants… compared with needling (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Investigator‐assessed adverse events (short‐term) · people with acne scars
Chemical peeling showed no clear difference in investigator‐assessed adverse events (short‐term) N of participants… compared with needling (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Participant‐assessed adverse events (short‐term) N of participants with positive adverse events · people with acne scars
It is very uncertain whether chemical peeling changes participant‐assessed adverse events (short‐term) N of participants… compared with needling (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review