Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

53 questions · 55 findings · 1 reviews · All outcomes

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 42 · 76.4%Very low 2 · 3.6%Low 7 · 12.7%Moderate 4 · 7.3%High 0 · 0%

Closest answers

The findings closest to your search, judged one by one by TypeSafe's Jev model.

Related · question page
- Vitapex (calcium hydroxide/iodoform) vs Calcium hydroxide (CH) · Radiological failure
  Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
  6 and 12 months
  RR 0.11 [0.01, 1.94]
  1 study · 40 participants
  GRADE not reported
Related · question page
- Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) + sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) · Radiological failure
  Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
  12 months
  RR 8.00 [1.06, 60.21]
  1 study · 62 participants
  GRADE not reported
Related · question page
- Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE) · Radiological failure
  Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
  6 months
  RR 2.50 [0.50, 12.50]
  2 studies · 110 participants
  Low
Related · question page
- Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Ferric sulphate (FS) · Radiological failure
  Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
  12 months
  RR 1.28 [0.53, 3.13]
  2 studies · 122 participants
  Low
Related · question page
- Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE) · Clinical failure
  Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
  12 months
  RR 9.00 [0.52, 156.92]
  1 study · 40 participants
  GRADE not reported

Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Formocresol (FC)

Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

Calcium hydroxide (CH) probably leads to higher radiological failure compared with formocresol (FC) (moderate certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
12 months
RR 1.86 [1.42, 2.44]
6 studies · 332 participants
Moderate
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
24 months
RR 3.11 [1.61, 6.02]
1 study · 120 participants
Low

Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Formocresol (FC)

Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

Calcium hydroxide (CH) may leads to higher clinical failure compared with formocresol (FC) (low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
24 months
RR 3.83 [1.68, 8.74]
1 study · 120 participants
Low
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
12 months
RR 1.87 [1.22, 2.89]
6 studies · 332 participants
Moderate

Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Ferric sulphate (FS)

Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

Calcium hydroxide (CH) showed no clear difference in radiological failure compared with ferric sulphate (FS) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
12 months
RR 1.28 [0.53, 3.13]
2 studies · 122 participants
Low

Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Ferric sulphate (FS)

Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

Calcium hydroxide (CH) showed no clear difference in clinical failure compared with ferric sulphate (FS) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
12 months
RR 3.41 [0.37, 31.61]
2 studies · 122 participants
Low

Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Portland cement (PC)

Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

Calcium hydroxide (CH) showed no clear difference in clinical failure compared with portland cement (PC); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
12 and 24 months
RR 13.00 [0.80, 212.02]
1 study · 30 participants
GRADE not reported

Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) + sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl)

Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

Calcium hydroxide (CH) showed no clear difference in clinical failure compared with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) + sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
12 months
RR 3.00 [0.13, 70.92]
1 study · 62 participants
GRADE not reported

Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Portland cement (PC)

Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

Calcium hydroxide (CH) led to higher radiological failure compared with portland cement (PC); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
12 months
RR 17.00 [1.07, 270.41]
1 study · 30 participants
GRADE not reported

Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE)

Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

Calcium hydroxide (CH) showed no clear difference in clinical failure compared with zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
12 months
RR 9.00 [0.52, 156.92]
1 study · 40 participants
GRADE not reported

Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) + sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl)

Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

Calcium hydroxide (CH) led to higher radiological failure compared with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) + sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
12 months
RR 8.00 [1.06, 60.21]
1 study · 62 participants
GRADE not reported

Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE)

Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

Calcium hydroxide (CH) showed no clear difference in radiological failure compared with zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
6 months
RR 2.50 [0.50, 12.50]
2 studies · 110 participants
Low

Calcium hydroxide cement (Dycal) vs Calcium sulphate hemihydrate (DentoGen)

Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

It is very uncertain whether calcium hydroxide cement (Dycal) changes clinical failure compared with calcium sulphate hemihydrate (DentoGen) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
12 months
RR 4.00 [0.49, 32.72]
1 study · 40 participants
Very low

Calcium hydroxide cement (Dycal) vs Calcium sulphate hemihydrate (DentoGen)

Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

It is very uncertain whether calcium hydroxide cement (Dycal) changes radiological failure compared with calcium sulphate hemihydrate (DentoGen) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
12 months
RR 1.67 [0.46, 6.06]
1 study · 40 participants
Very low

Metapex (calcium hydroxide/iodoform) vs Endoflas chlorophenol free (Endoflas-CF)

Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

Metapex (calcium hydroxide/iodoform) showed no clear difference in radiological failure compared with endoflas chlorophenol free (Endoflas-CF); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
6 and 12 months
RR 1.33 [0.35, 5.03]
1 study · 32 participants
GRADE not reported

Vitapex (calcium hydroxide/iodoform) vs RC Fill

Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

Vitapex (calcium hydroxide/iodoform) showed no clear difference in radiological failure compared with RC Fill; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
12 months
RR 2.00 [0.65, 6.15]
1 study · 86 participants
GRADE not reported

Metapex (calcium hydroxide/iodoform) vs Endoflas (CH + ZOE + iodoform)

Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

Metapex (calcium hydroxide/iodoform) showed no clear difference in radiological failure compared with endoflas (CH + ZOE + iodoform); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
6 months
RR 2.02 [0.79, 5.15]
2 studies · 92 participants
GRADE not reported

Vitapex (calcium hydroxide/iodoform) vs Calcium hydroxide (CH)

Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

Vitapex (calcium hydroxide/iodoform) showed no clear difference in radiological failure compared with calcium hydroxide (CH); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
6 and 12 months
RR 0.11 [0.01, 1.94]
1 study · 40 participants
GRADE not reported

Metapex (calcium hydroxide/iodoform) vs Zinc oxide and propolis (ZOP)

Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

Metapex (calcium hydroxide/iodoform) showed no clear difference in clinical failure compared with zinc oxide and propolis (ZOP); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
12 months
RR 2.00 [0.20, 19.91]
1 study · 32 participants
GRADE not reported

Vitapex (calcium hydroxide/iodoform) vs 3Mix (ciprofloxacin + metronidazole + minocycline)

Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

Vitapex (calcium hydroxide/iodoform) showed no clear difference in radiological failure compared with 3Mix (ciprofloxacin + metronidazole + minocycline); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
12 months
RR 1.83 [0.80, 4.19]
1 study · 50 participants
GRADE not reported

Metapex (calcium hydroxide/iodoform) vs Endoflas chlorophenol free (Endoflas-CF)

Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

Metapex (calcium hydroxide/iodoform) showed no clear difference in clinical failure compared with endoflas chlorophenol free (Endoflas-CF); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
12 months
RR 1.00 [0.16, 6.25]
1 study · 32 participants
GRADE not reported

Vitapex (calcium hydroxide/iodoform) vs 3Mix (ciprofloxacin + metronidazole + minocycline)

Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

Vitapex (calcium hydroxide/iodoform) showed no clear difference in clinical failure compared with 3Mix (ciprofloxacin + metronidazole + minocycline); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
12 months
RR 1.00 [0.07, 15.12]
1 study · 50 participants
GRADE not reported