Resolution of daytime urinary incontinence · children aged 5 to 15 years with dysfunctional elimination syndrome, 41/59 with daytime urinary incontinence
It is very uncertain whether pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) with electromyography… changes resolution of daytime urinary incontinence at 12 months (9 months… compared with pelvic floor muscle training without biofeedback but with standard… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Frequency of incontinence episodes · children aged 5 to 15 years with dysfunctional elimination syndrome, 41/59 with daytime urinary incontinence
1 finding from 1 review
Objective measurement of volume of incontinent episodes · children aged 5 to 15 years with dysfunctional elimination syndrome, 41/59 with daytime urinary incontinence
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Resource implications (e.g. cost of incontinence management methods) · children aged 5 to 15 years with dysfunctional elimination syndrome, 41/59 with daytime urinary incontinence
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Quality of life measurements · children aged 5 to 15 years with dysfunctional elimination syndrome, 41/59 with daytime urinary incontinence
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse effects · children aged 5 to 15 years with dysfunctional elimination syndrome, 41/59 with daytime urinary incontinence
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Number of incontinent men ‐ after 12 months · Men with UI after TURP
1 finding from 1 review
Incontinence‐specific quality of life · Men with UI after TURP
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events ‐ not reported · Men with UI after TURP
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Economic analysis using QALY ‐ not reported · Men with UI after TURP
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Number of incontinent men ‐ after 12 months · Patients with postprostatectomy UI
Treatment of UI after radical: PFMT ± biofeedback showed no clear difference in number of incontinent men ‐ after 12 months compared with no treatment; (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Urinary Incontinence Score (ICI‐SF) ‐ after first year · Patients with postprostatectomy UI
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events · Patients with postprostatectomy UI
1 finding from 1 review
Economic analysis using QALY ‐ not reported · Patients with postprostatectomy UI
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Number of incontinent men ‐ after 12 months · All men after radical prostatectomy
Prevention of UI after radical: PFMT ± biofeedback probably leads to lower number of incontinent men ‐ after 12 months compared with no treatment (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Incontinence‐specific quality of life · All men after radical prostatectomy
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events ‐ not reported · All men after radical prostatectomy
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Economic analysis using QALY ‐ not reported · All men after radical prostatectomy
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Perception of improvement or cure · men with urinary incontinence following prostate surgery
1 finding from 1 review
Disease‐specific quality of life · men with urinary incontinence following prostate surgery
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found