Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

117 questions · 117 findings · 11 reviews

No studies found 42 · 35.9%GRADE not reported 7 · 6%Very low 39 · 33.3%Low 19 · 16.2%Moderate 9 · 7.7%High 1 · 0.9%

Treatment of UI after radical: PFMT ± biofeedback vs no treatment;

Number of incontinent men ‐ after 12 months · Patients with postprostatectomy UI

Treatment of UI after radical: PFMT ± biofeedback showed no clear difference in number of incontinent men ‐ after 12 months compared with no treatment; (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Prevention of UI after radical: PFMT ± biofeedback vs no treatment

Number of incontinent men ‐ after 12 months · All men after radical prostatectomy

Prevention of UI after radical: PFMT ± biofeedback probably leads to lower number of incontinent men ‐ after 12 months compared with no treatment (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) plus biofeedback vs no treatment, sham treatment or verbal/written instruction

Number of participants experiencing surface or skin‐related adverse events: e.g. skin reactions, bruising, hypersensitivity to gel · men with urinary incontinence following prostate surgery
1 finding from 1 review

Prevention of UI after TURP: pre or post‐operative PFMT ± biofeedback vs no treatment

Number of incontinent men ‐ within 3 to 6 months · All men after TURP

It is very uncertain whether prevention of UI after TURP: pre or post‐operative PFMT ± biofeedback changes number of incontinent men ‐ within 3 to 6 months compared with no treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review