Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue probably leads to lower repeat surgery for prolapse, SUI or mesh exposure (1‐3 years) compared with polypropylene mesh (moderate certainty).
It is very uncertain whether anterior prolapse repair: native tissue changes repeat surgery for prolapse (stage 2 or greater) at 2 years compared with absorbable mesh (very low certainty).
Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue showed no clear difference in repeat surgery for prolapse (1‐2 years) compared with biological graft (moderate certainty).
Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue probably leads to higher repeat surgery for prolapse (1‐3 years) compared with polypropylene mesh (moderate certainty).
Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue showed no clear difference in repeat surgery for stress urinary incontinence (1‐2 years) compared with polypropylene mesh (low certainty).
Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue showed no clear difference in awareness of prolapse (1‐2 years) compared with biological graft (low certainty).
Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue showed no clear difference in stress urinary incontinence (de novo) (1‐3 years) compared with polypropylene mesh (low certainty).
Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue showed no clear difference in dyspareunia (de novo) (1‐2 years) compared with polypropylene mesh (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether anterior prolapse repair: native tissue changes awareness of prolapse (2 years) compared with absorbable mesh (very low certainty).
Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue probably leads to higher recurrent anterior compartment prolapse (3 months to 2 years) compared with absorbable mesh (moderate certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
It is very uncertain whether anterior prolapse repair: native tissue changes stress urinary incontinence (2 years) compared with absorbable mesh (very low certainty).
Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue probably leads to higher recurrent anterior compartment prolapse (1‐2 years) compared with biological graft (moderate certainty).
Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue showed no clear difference in stress urinary incontinence (1‐2 years) compared with biological graft (moderate certainty).
Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue showed no clear difference in dyspareunia (1‐2 years) compared with biological graft (low certainty).
Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue probably leads to higher awareness of prolapse (1‐3 years) compared with polypropylene mesh (moderate certainty).
Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue may leads to higher recurrent anterior compartment prolapse (1‐3 years) compared with polypropylene mesh (low certainty).