Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

5 questions · 5 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 2 · 40%Moderate 3 · 60%High 0 · 0%

Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue vs biological graft

Awareness of prolapse · women with anterior compartment pelvic organ prolapse

Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue showed no clear difference in awareness of prolapse (1‐2 years) compared with biological graft (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for women with anterior compartment prolapse 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.98 [0.52, 1.82]
5 studies · 552 participants
Low

Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue vs biological graft

Surgery for recurrent prolapse · women with anterior compartment pelvic organ prolapse

Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue showed no clear difference in repeat surgery for prolapse (1‐2 years) compared with biological graft (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for women with anterior compartment prolapse 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.02 [0.53, 1.97]
7 studies · 650 participants
Moderate

Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue vs biological graft

Recurrent anterior compartment prolapse (1‐2 years) · women with anterior compartment pelvic organ prolapse

Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue probably leads to higher recurrent anterior compartment prolapse (1‐2 years) compared with biological graft (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for women with anterior compartment prolapse 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.32 [1.06, 1.65]
8 studies · 701 participants
Moderate

Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue vs biological graft

Bladder function ‐ Stress incontinence · women with anterior compartment pelvic organ prolapse

Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue showed no clear difference in stress urinary incontinence (1‐2 years) compared with biological graft (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for women with anterior compartment prolapse 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.44 [0.79, 2.64]
2 studies · 218 participants
Moderate

Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue vs biological graft

Painful intercourse ‐ Dyspareunia · women with anterior compartment pelvic organ prolapse

Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue showed no clear difference in dyspareunia (1‐2 years) compared with biological graft (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for women with anterior compartment prolapse 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.87 [0.39, 1.93]
2 studies · 151 participants
Low