Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 33.3%Low 1 · 33.3%Moderate 1 · 33.3%High 0 · 0%

Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue vs absorbable mesh

Awareness of prolapse · women with anterior compartment pelvic organ prolapse

It is very uncertain whether anterior prolapse repair: native tissue changes awareness of prolapse (2 years) compared with absorbable mesh (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for women with anterior compartment prolapse 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.95 [0.7, 1.31]
1 study · 54 participants
Very low

Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue vs biological graft

Awareness of prolapse · women with anterior compartment pelvic organ prolapse

Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue showed no clear difference in awareness of prolapse (1‐2 years) compared with biological graft (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for women with anterior compartment prolapse 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.98 [0.52, 1.82]
5 studies · 552 participants
Low

Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue vs polypropylene mesh

Awareness of prolapse · women with anterior compartment pelvic organ prolapse

Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue probably leads to higher awareness of prolapse (1‐3 years) compared with polypropylene mesh (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for women with anterior compartment prolapse 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.77 [1.37, 2.28]
9 studies · 1133 participants
Moderate