Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2 questions · 2 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1 · 50%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 50%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue vs absorbable mesh

De novo dyspareunia · women with anterior compartment pelvic organ prolapse

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for women with anterior compartment prolapse 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue vs polypropylene mesh

De novo dyspareunia · women with anterior compartment pelvic organ prolapse

Anterior prolapse repair: native tissue showed no clear difference in dyspareunia (de novo) (1‐2 years) compared with polypropylene mesh (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for women with anterior compartment prolapse 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.54 [0.27, 1.06]
8 studies · 583 participants
Low