Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4 questions · 4 findings · 1 reviews

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 4 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Restoration failure · Children with carious primary teeth

No comparative effect estimate was reported; failure rates were 32% and 12%.

1 finding from 1 review

Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious primary teeth without pulp therapy: a… 2022 All outcomes
2 years · University · Class II
Annual failure rate (%) amalgam 17.5%; composite resin 6.2%
1 study · 43 participants
GRADE not reported

Restoration failure · Children with carious primary teeth

No comparative effect estimate was reported; tabulated failure rates favored resin-modified GIC.

1 finding from 1 review

Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious primary teeth without pulp therapy: a… 2022 All outcomes
1 year · Not reported · Class II
Annual failure rate (%) amalgam 28.0%; RMGIC 16.9%
1 study · 120 participants
GRADE not reported

Restoration failure · Children with carious primary teeth

No comparative effect estimate was reported; conventional GIC had a higher tabulated failure rate.

1 finding from 1 review

Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious primary teeth without pulp therapy: a… 2022 All outcomes
5 years · University · Class I and II
Annual failure rate (%) amalgam 4.4%; conventional GIC 7.6%
1 study · 76 participants
GRADE not reported

Restoration failure · Children with carious primary teeth

No comparative effect estimate was reported; the review described similar clinical performance.

1 finding from 1 review

Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious primary teeth without pulp therapy: a… 2022 All outcomes
2 years · Private dental practice · Class II
Annual failure rate (%) amalgam 1.0%; compomer 1.0%
1 study · 75 participants
GRADE not reported