What do systematic reviews say?

14 questions · 14 findings · 1 reviews · Anaesthesia

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1 · 7.1%GRADE not reported 3 · 21.4%Very low 2 · 14.3%Low 8 · 57.1%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Closest answers

The findings closest to your search, judged one by one by TypeSafe's Jev model.

Direct match · question page
- Advanced haemodynamic monitoring vs protocol using standard measures such · All‐cause mortality Advanced haemodynamic monitoring
  Perioperative fluid volume optimization following proximal femoral fracture 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.41 [0.14, 1.2]
  3 studies · 280 participants
  Very low
Direct match · question page
- Advanced haemodynamic monitoring vs usual care · Total length of hospital stay
  Perioperative fluid volume optimization following proximal femoral fracture 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 175 participants
  Low
Direct match · question page
- Advanced haemodynamic monitoring vs usual care · All‐cause mortality
  Perioperative fluid volume optimization following proximal femoral fracture 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.45 [0.07, 2.95]
  3 studies · 213 participants
  Low
Direct match · question page
- Advanced haemodynamic monitoring vs protocol using standard measures such · Total length of hospital stay
  Perioperative fluid volume optimization following proximal femoral fracture 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 203 participants
  Low
Direct match · question page
- Advanced haemodynamic monitoring vs protocol using standard measures such · Adverse outcomes ‐ all
  Perioperative fluid volume optimization following proximal femoral fracture 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.9 [0.37, 2.18]
  3 studies · 280 participants
  Very low

Advanced haemodynamic monitoring vs protocol using standard measures such

All‐cause mortality Advanced haemodynamic monitoring · patients with proximal femoral fracture

It is very uncertain whether advanced haemodynamic monitoring changes all‐cause mortality Advanced haemodynamic monitoring compared with protocol using standard measures such (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Perioperative fluid volume optimization following proximal femoral fracture 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.41 [0.14, 1.2]
3 studies · 280 participants
Very low

Advanced haemodynamic monitoring vs usual care

Medically fit for discharge · patients with perioperative fluid optimization

1 finding from 1 review

Perioperative fluid volume optimization following proximal femoral fracture 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 175 participants
Low

Advanced haemodynamic monitoring vs usual care

Return to pre‐fracture accommodation/return to pre‐fracture mobility · patients with perioperative fluid optimization

1 finding from 1 review

Perioperative fluid volume optimization following proximal femoral fracture 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 114 participants
Low

Advanced haemodynamic monitoring vs usual care

Adverse outcomes ‐ cardiopulmonary · patients with perioperative fluid optimization

1 finding from 1 review

Perioperative fluid volume optimization following proximal femoral fracture 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

Advanced haemodynamic monitoring vs usual care

Adverse outcomes ‐ neurological · patients with perioperative fluid optimization

Advanced haemodynamic monitoring showed no clear difference in adverse outcomes ‐ neurological compared with usual care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Perioperative fluid volume optimization following proximal femoral fracture 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.1 [0.56, 2.18]
2 studies · 173 participants
Low

Advanced haemodynamic monitoring vs usual care

Adverse outcomes ‐ all · patients with perioperative fluid optimization

Advanced haemodynamic monitoring showed no clear difference in adverse outcomes ‐ all compared with usual care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Perioperative fluid volume optimization following proximal femoral fracture 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.78 [0.57, 1.05]
2 studies · 173 participants
Low

Advanced haemodynamic monitoring vs protocol using standard measures such

Length of hospital stay · patients with proximal femoral fracture

1 finding from 1 review

Perioperative fluid volume optimization following proximal femoral fracture 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 203 participants
Low

Advanced haemodynamic monitoring vs protocol using standard measures such

Medically fit for discharge · patients with proximal femoral fracture

1 finding from 1 review

Perioperative fluid volume optimization following proximal femoral fracture 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 90 participants
Low

Advanced haemodynamic monitoring vs protocol using standard measures such

Return to pre‐fracture accommodation/return to pre‐fracture mobility · patients with proximal femoral fracture

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Perioperative fluid volume optimization following proximal femoral fracture 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Advanced haemodynamic monitoring vs protocol using standard measures such

Adverse outcomes ‐ cardiopulmonary · patients with proximal femoral fracture

1 finding from 1 review

Perioperative fluid volume optimization following proximal femoral fracture 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

Advanced haemodynamic monitoring vs protocol using standard measures such

Adverse outcomes ‐ neurological · patients with proximal femoral fracture

1 finding from 1 review

Perioperative fluid volume optimization following proximal femoral fracture 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

Advanced haemodynamic monitoring vs protocol using standard measures such

Adverse outcomes ‐ all · patients with proximal femoral fracture

It is very uncertain whether advanced haemodynamic monitoring changes adverse outcomes ‐ all compared with protocol using standard measures such (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Perioperative fluid volume optimization following proximal femoral fracture 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.9 [0.37, 2.18]
3 studies · 280 participants
Very low

Advanced haemodynamic monitoring vs usual care

All‐cause mortality · patients with perioperative fluid optimization

Advanced haemodynamic monitoring showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality compared with usual care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Perioperative fluid volume optimization following proximal femoral fracture 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.45 [0.07, 2.95]
3 studies · 213 participants
Low

Advanced haemodynamic monitoring vs usual care

Length of hospital stay · patients with perioperative fluid optimization

1 finding from 1 review

Perioperative fluid volume optimization following proximal femoral fracture 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 175 participants
Low