Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2 questions · 2 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 50%Low 1 · 50%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Adjuvant growth hormone vs no adjuvant: routine use

Clinical pregnancy rate · women with infertility

It is very uncertain whether adjuvant growth hormone changes clinical pregnancy rate per woman randomised compared with no adjuvant: routine use (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Growth hormone for in vitro fertilisation (IVF) 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.78 [0.49, 6.5]
1 study · 42 participants
Very low

Adjuvant growth hormone vs no adjuvant: poor responders

Clinical pregnancy rate · women with infertility subclassified as poor responders

Adjuvant growth hormone may leads to higher clinical pregnancy rate per woman randomised compared with no adjuvant: poor responders (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Growth hormone for in vitro fertilisation (IVF) 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.85 [1.35, 2.53]
11 studies · 1033 participants
Low