ACTIVA bioactive restorative material vs Glass ionomer cement (GIC)
Secondary caries · Patients requiring dental restoration; permanent teeth
Over 1 year in permanent teeth, the effect of ACTIVA versus GIC on secondary caries is very uncertain (RR 22.80, 95% CI 0.89-584.17; very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Clinical efficacy of bioactive restorative materials in controlling secondary caries: a systematic review and network… 2023 All outcomes1 year of follow-up · Restorative dentistry clinical settings; primary studies conducted across multiple countriesRR 22.80 [0.89, 584.17]1 study · 153 participantsVery low