Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2 questions · 2 findings · 1 reviews · Dental caries

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 2 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

38% SDF plus potassium iodide (KI) (indirect pulp capping) vs Resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC)

Secondary caries prevention in young permanent first molars · Children with deep occlusal caries in young permanent first molars (indirect pulp capping)

SDF+KI and RMGIC did not differ significantly for secondary caries prevention (p>0.05; ungraded).

1 finding from 1 review

A systematic review on the effect of silver diamine fluoride for management of dental caries in permanent teeth. 2023 All outcomes
12 months · University dental clinic (children) · Baraka 2022
SDF+KI 2 (8%) vs RMGIC 0 (0%); p=0.63 (NS), 12 months
1 study · 49 participants
GRADE not reported

38% SDF plus potassium iodide (KI) (indirect pulp capping) vs Resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC)

Secondary prevention of caries · children with deep occlusal carious lesions in permanent molars

No significant difference in secondary caries prevention was reported; no effect estimate or GRADE rating was reported.

1 finding from 1 review

A systematic review on the effect of silver diamine fluoride for management of dental caries in permanent teeth. 2023 All outcomes
12 months · Alexandria Egypt
SDF+KI 2 (8%) vs RMGIC 0 (0%); p=0.63 (NS), 12 months
1 study · 49 participants
GRADE not reported