Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4 questions · 4 findings · 1 reviews · Anaesthesia

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 4 · 100%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Closest answers

The findings closest to your search, judged one by one by TypeSafe's Jev model.

Direct match · question page
- 3% mepivacaine plain vs 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine · Success of local anaesthesia (pulpal, electric pulp tester; healthy pulps)
  Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
  RR 0.92 [0.83, 1.02]
  6 studies · 208 participants
  Low
Direct match · question page
- 3% mepivacaine plain vs 2% lidocaine, 1:50,000 epinephrine · Success of local anaesthesia (pulpal, electric pulp tester; healthy pulps)
  Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
  RR 0.97 [0.88, 1.07]
  2 studies · 70 participants
  Low
Related · question page
- 3% mepivacaine plain vs 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine · Speed of onset of anaesthesia (pulpal, electric pulp tester; healthy pulps)
  Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
  MD -1.23 [-2.31, -0.16]
  3 studies · 85 participants
  Low
Related · question page
- 3% mepivacaine plain vs 2% lidocaine, 1:50,000 epinephrine · Speed of onset of anaesthesia (pulpal, electric pulp tester; healthy pulps)
  Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
  MD -0.56 [-1.54, 0.42]
  2 studies · 58 participants
  Low

3% mepivacaine plain vs 2% lidocaine, 1:50,000 epinephrine

Success of local anaesthesia (pulpal, electric pulp tester; healthy pulps) · Participants of any age and gender undergoing dental procedures, and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which…

3% mepivacaine plain showed no clear difference in success of local anaesthesia (pulpal, electric pulp tester; healthy… compared with 2% lidocaine, 1:50,000 epinephrine (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
RR 0.97 [0.88, 1.07]
2 studies · 70 participants
Low

3% mepivacaine plain vs 2% lidocaine, 1:50,000 epinephrine

Speed of onset of anaesthesia (pulpal, electric pulp tester; healthy pulps) · Participants of any age and gender undergoing dental procedures, and volunteers who took part in simulated scenario studies in which…

3% mepivacaine plain showed no clear difference in speed of onset of anaesthesia (pulpal, electric pulp tester; healthy… compared with 2% lidocaine, 1:50,000 epinephrine (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
MD -0.56 [-1.54, 0.42]
2 studies · 58 participants
Low

3% mepivacaine plain vs 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine

3% mepivacaine plain showed no clear difference in success of local anaesthesia (pulpal, electric pulp tester; healthy… compared with 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
RR 0.92 [0.83, 1.02]
6 studies · 208 participants
Low

3% mepivacaine plain vs 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine

3% mepivacaine plain may leads to lower speed of onset of anaesthesia (pulpal, electric pulp tester; healthy… compared with 2% lidocaine, 1:100,000 epinephrine (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Injectable local anaesthetic agents for dental anaesthesia 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
MD -1.23 [-2.31, -0.16]
3 studies · 85 participants
Low