Search

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

211 questions · 317 findings · 16 reviews · Periodontology · related questions CL0289

No studies found 44 · 13.9%GRADE not reported 184 · 58%Very low 59 · 18.6%Low 21 · 6.6%Moderate 5 · 1.6%High 4 · 1.3%

Azithromycin + SRP vs SRP

Clinical attachment level (CAL) · Adults with periodontitis (chronic and aggressive)

It is very uncertain whether azithromycin + SRP changes clinical attachment level (CAL) compared with SRP (very low certainty).

3 findings from 1 review

Moxifloxacin + SRP vs SRP

Probing pocket depth · Adults with chronic periodontitis

Moxifloxacin + SRP led to lower probing pocket depth compared with SRP; GRADE not reported.

2 findings from 1 review

Moxifloxacin + SRP vs SRP

Clinical attachment level (CAL) · Adults with chronic periodontitis

Moxifloxacin + SRP led to lower clinical attachment level (CAL) compared with SRP; GRADE not reported.

2 findings from 1 review

Clarithromycin + SRP vs SRP

Probing pocket depth · Adults with periodontitis (chronic and aggressive)

Clarithromycin + SRP led to lower probing pocket depth compared with SRP; GRADE not reported.

2 findings from 1 review

Metronidazole + SRP vs Amoxicillin + metronidazole + SRP

Probing pocket depth · Adults with periodontitis (chronic and aggressive)

Metronidazole + SRP showed no clear difference in probing pocket depth compared with amoxicillin + metronidazole + SRP; GRADE not reported.

2 findings from 1 review

Metronidazole + SRP vs SRP

Clinical attachment level (CAL) · Adults with periodontitis (chronic and aggressive)

Metronidazole + SRP showed no clear difference in clinical attachment level (CAL) compared with SRP; GRADE not reported.

3 findings from 1 review

Levofloxacin + SRP vs SRP

Clinical attachment level (CAL) · Adults with chronic periodontitis

Levofloxacin + SRP led to lower clinical attachment level (CAL) compared with SRP; GRADE not reported.

2 findings from 1 review

Autologous platelet concentrates (APC) + open flap debridement (OFD) vs Open flap debridement (access flap surgery)

Change in probing pocket depth (PPD) · Patients affected by infrabony defects requiring surgical treatment, regardless of their age or gender

It is very uncertain whether autologous platelet concentrates (APC) + open flap debridement (OFD) changes change in probing depth (PD) (mm) compared with OFD (open flap debridement) alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Autologous platelet concentrates (APC) + open flap debridement (OFD) vs Open flap debridement (access flap surgery)

Tooth survival · Patients affected by infrabony defects requiring surgical treatment, regardless of their age or gender
1 finding from 1 review

Autologous platelet concentrates (APC) + open flap debridement (OFD) + bone graft (BG) vs OFD + BG (open flap debridement + bone graft)

Change in radiographic bone defect filling (RBF) (%) · Patients affected by infrabony defects requiring surgical treatment, regardless of their age or gender

Autologous platelet concentrates (APC) + open flap debridement (OFD)… led to higher change in radiographic bone defect filling (RBF) (%) compared with OFD + BG (open flap debridement + bone graft); GRADE not reported.

3 findings from 1 review

Autologous platelet concentrates (APC) + guided tissue regeneration (GTR) vs GTR (guided tissue regeneration) alone

Attachment change · Patients affected by infrabony defects requiring surgical treatment, regardless of their age or gender

It is very uncertain whether autologous platelet concentrates (APC) + guided tissue regeneration… changes change in clinical attachment level (CAL) (mm) compared with GTR (guided tissue regeneration) alone (very low certainty).

3 findings from 1 review