Overweight/obesity risk · Healthy, term-born, normal-birth-weight infants aged 4-24 months (breastfed and/or formula-fed) in Western industrialized countries
Responsive complementary feeding probably reduces the risk of overweight/obesity versus other feeding models (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.71; moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Overweight/obesity risk · Healthy, term-born, normal-birth-weight infants aged 4-24 months (breastfed and/or formula-fed) in Western industrialized countries
Non-responsive complementary feeding showed no significant association with overweight/obesity across observational studies (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Overweight/obesity risk · Healthy, term-born, normal-birth-weight infants aged 4-24 months (breastfed and/or formula-fed) in Western industrialized countries
Among observational studies, baby-led weaning was associated with lower odds of overweight/obesity than other feeding models (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.55), but certainty is very low.
1 finding from 1 review
Overweight/obesity risk · Healthy children aged 6–24 months in Western industrialized countries
BLW was associated with lower overweight/obesity risk in observational studies, but the certainty was very low.
1 finding from 1 review
Overweight/obesity risk · Healthy, term-born, normal-birth-weight infants aged 4-24 months (breastfed and/or formula-fed) in Western industrialized countries
In RCTs, BLISS did not significantly change overweight/obesity risk versus traditional feeding (RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.00 to 17.79; low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Overweight/obesity risk · Healthy children aged 6–24 months in Western industrialized countries
BLISS did not show a statistically significant reduction in overweight/obesity risk at 24 months (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review