What do systematic reviews say?

1 questions · 1 findings · 1 reviews · related questions CL0289

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 1 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Closest answers

The findings closest to your search, judged one by one by TypeSafe's Jev model.

Direct match · question page
- Non-metal carbon-fibre post and core (Category III; Composipost) vs Metal custom-cast post and core (Category I; gold alloy) · Clinical/technical failure (root fracture)
  Root canal posts for the restoration of root filled teeth 2007 · Cochrane All outcomes
  48 months (4 years)
  RR 0.05 [0.00, 0.90]
  1 study · 195 participants
  GRADE not reported

Non-metal carbon-fibre post and core (Category III; Composipost) vs Metal custom-cast post and core (Category I)

Clinical/technical failure (root fracture) · Participants with permanent endodontically-treated (root-filled) teeth for which a post is indicated to retain the final restoration

Non-metal carbon-fibre post and core (Category III; Composipost) led to lower clinical/technical failure (root fracture) compared with metal custom-cast post and core (Category I; gold alloy); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Root canal posts for the restoration of root filled teeth 2007 · Cochrane All outcomes
48 months (4 years)
RR 0.05 [0.00, 0.90]
1 study · 195 participants
GRADE not reported