What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 2 reviews · Oral Health · related questions CL0289

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 3 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Flapless implant placement vs Conventional flap elevation

Biological complications · People with dental implants

Flapless implant placement showed no clear difference in biological complications compared with conventional flap elevation; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: management of soft tissues for dental implants 2012 · Cochrane All outcomes
RR 5.58 [0.65, 48.23]
1 study · 80 participants
GRADE not reported

Crestal incision vs Vestibular incision

Biological complications · People with dental implants

Crestal incision led to lower biological complications compared with vestibular incision; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: management of soft tissues for dental implants 2012 · Cochrane All outcomes
Biological complications: Odds Ratio (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI), Subtotals only (no pooled estimate reported); 1 study (Heydenrijk 2000); 4 crestal vs 1 vestibular had hyperplastic tissue over the healing abutment
1 study
GRADE not reported

1-stage (non-submerged) implant placement vs 2-stage (submerged) implant placement

Complications (biological and biomechanical) · People with dental implants

1-stage (non-submerged) implant placement showed no clear difference in complications (biological and biomechanical) compared with 2-stage (submerged) implant placement; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: 1- versus 2-stage implant placement 2009 · Cochrane All outcomes
6 to 12 months after loading
RR 0.13 [0.01, 2.25]
1 study · 30 participants
GRADE not reported