What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 1 reviews · related questions CL0289

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 3 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

Portland cement (PC) showed no clear difference in radiological failure compared with enamel matrix derivative (EMD); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
24 months
RR 0.57 [0.18, 1.78]
1 study · 70 participants
GRADE not reported

Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
up to 24 months
No events in any participant; not estimable
1 study · 30 participants
GRADE not reported

Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

Portland cement (PC) showed no clear difference in radiological failure compared with full strength formocresol (FC); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
24 months
RR 0.80 [0.23, 2.73]
1 study · 70 participants
GRADE not reported