What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 1 reviews · related questions CL0289

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 3 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

Portland cement (PC) showed no clear difference in clinical failure compared with enamel matrix derivative (EMD); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
6, 12 and 24 months
RR 0.67 [0.12, 3.75]
1 study · 70 participants
GRADE not reported

Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
up to 24 months
No events in any participant (Lourenco 2015a); not estimable
1 study · 30 participants
GRADE not reported

Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

Portland cement (PC) showed no clear difference in clinical failure compared with full strength formocresol (FC); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
6, 12 and 24 months
RR 2.00 [0.19, 21.06]
1 study · 70 participants
GRADE not reported