EMP + CAF vs CAF
Attachment change · Adult patients with single (localised) recession-type defects (Miller Class I/II, at least 3 mm)
EMP + CAF showed no clear difference in clinical attachment level change compared with CAF (low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
- Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession‐type defects 2018 · Cochrane All outcomesShort term (6 to 12 months)MD 0.22 [-0.02, 0.45]3 studies · 136 participantsLow
- Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession‐type defects 2018 · Cochrane All outcomesShort and medium term (6 to 24 months)MD 0.35 [0.09, 0.61]3 studiesGRADE not reported