What do systematic reviews say?

5 questions · 5 findings · 1 reviews · related questions CL0289

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 4 · 80%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 20%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

Biodentine showed no clear difference in radiological failure compared with tempophore; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
6 and 12 months
RR 0.54 [0.11, 2.70]
1 study · 56 participants
GRADE not reported

Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

Biodentine showed no clear difference in radiological failure compared with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
6 months
RR 2.40 [0.65, 8.84]
4 studies · 234 participants
Low

Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
6 and 12 months
No radiological failure in any participant; not estimable
1 study · 62 participants
GRADE not reported

Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
6 months
No radiological failure in any participant; not estimable
1 study · 112 participants
GRADE not reported

Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

Biodentine showed no clear difference in radiological failure compared with propolis; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
6 months
RR 0.43 [0.12, 1.47]
1 study · 50 participants
GRADE not reported