Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

10 questions in 5 reviews · cluster CL0181

current versions
No studies 1 · 10%Ungraded 9 · 90%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Intervention categories, outcome domains and clusters are a proposed key pending human validation. Clear all filters

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Grape seed extract (GSE) and its proanthocyanidin fractions vs Untreated or vehicle control (some studies vs positive antimicrobial controls, e.g. chlorhexidine/fluoride)
Cell death / cytotoxicity · Streptococcus mutans (in vitro cultures and biofilms)
Effect of flavonoids from grape seed and cranberry extracts on the microbiological activity of Streptococcus… (2024)
GSE showed a very low level of cell damage (<1%, few visible dead cells) (Furiga).1 studyUngraded
Grape seed extract or grape seed flavonoid fractions vs No extract or vehicle control; other antimicrobial agents
Cell damage or cytotoxicity · Streptococcus mutans cultures and biofilms
Effect of flavonoids from grape seed and cranberry extracts on the microbiological activity of Streptococcus… (2024)
no estimate extracted1 studyUngraded
Cranberry extract / juice and proanthocyanidin (flavonoid) fractions vs Untreated or vehicle control (some studies vs positive antimicrobial controls, e.g. chlorhexidine/fluoride)
Cell death / cytotoxicity induction · Streptococcus mutans (in vitro cultures and biofilms)
Effect of flavonoids from grape seed and cranberry extracts on the microbiological activity of Streptococcus… (2024)
Cranberry extract produced a time- and concentration-dependent reduction in bacterial count, with a 50% reduction after 10 h (Singhal).1 studyUngraded
Primary closure of the extraction socket with a mucoperiosteal flap vs Application of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) without primary closure
Rate of complications and side effects of the intervention · People on antiresorptive treatment undergoing tooth extraction (at risk of MRONJ) · 90 days
Interventions for managing medication‐related osteonecrosis of the jaw (2022) · Cochrane
No intraoperative complications occurred in either group. Postoperative complications: 6 participants (15.4%) in the mucoperiosteal flap group and 1 participant (2.6%) in the PRF group.1 study · 77 participantsUngraded
Lingual nerve retractor (subperiosteal or Free's) vs No retractor
Adverse effects (reactionary bleeding) · Adults with mandibular third molars requiring removal · up to 30 days
Surgical techniques for the removal of mandibular wisdom teeth (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Herbal extracts (tea components; Chinese herbal mixture; freeze-dried black raspberry gel) vs Placebo or no treatment
Safety of the intervention (adverse effects) · People with a diagnosis of oral leukoplakia · up to 3 months
Interventions for treating oral leukoplakia to prevent oral cancer (2016) · Cochrane
SoF 4, Safety of the intervention up to 3 months: '3 studies measured adverse effects: green tea extract capsules caused high frequency (93%) of adverse effects of varying severity in 1 study; the mixed tea study did…3 studiesUngraded
LongoVital (herbal plus vitamin supplement) vs Placebo
Adverse effects · Participants with a previous or current history of recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS), diagnosed on history and… · 4 months
Systemic interventions for recurrent aphthous stomatitis (mouth ulcers) (2012) · Cochrane
Reported adverse events were minor and evenly distributed between the groups.1 study · 40 participantsUngraded
Bee propolis (one 500 mg capsule per day) vs Placebo
Adverse effects · Participants with a previous or current history of recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS), diagnosed on history and… · 6 months (minimum)
Systemic interventions for recurrent aphthous stomatitis (mouth ulcers) (2012) · Cochrane
Propolis was associated with low rates of minimal side effects.1 study · 19 participantsUngraded
LongoVital (herbal plus vitamin component) vs LongoVital (herbal component alone)
Adverse effects · Participants with a previous or current history of recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS), diagnosed on history and… · 4 months
Systemic interventions for recurrent aphthous stomatitis (mouth ulcers) (2012) · Cochrane
Reported adverse events were minor and evenly distributed between the groups (Kolseth 2005).1 study · 40 participantsUngraded
LongoVital (herbal component alone) vs Placebo
Adverse effects · Participants with a previous or current history of recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS), diagnosed on history and…
Systemic interventions for recurrent aphthous stomatitis (mouth ulcers) (2012) · Cochrane
Reported adverse events were minor and evenly distributed between the groups (Kolseth 2005). 'Very few and mostly harmless side-effects' were observed (Bratel 2005).2 studiesUngraded