Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Population

Intervention or exposure

Comparison

Outcome

Any field or review title

Field or topic

Source

Review versions

1 questions in 1 reviews · intervention: Slow-release fluoride device · outcome domain: Restoration survival/failure

current versions

No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 100%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Intervention categories, outcome domains and clusters are a proposed key pending human validation. Clear all filters

Question	Effect	Evidence	Status / GRADE
Slow-release fluoride device (fluoride glass beads) vs Placebo or usual care (control) Retention of slow-release fluoride devices (devices staying intact) · Children with high risk of dental decay · 2 years Slow‐release fluoride devices for the control of dental decay (2018) · Cochrane	132 (1 study); very low; Only 63/132 (47.7%) children who were still available at 2-year follow-up had the devices intact	1 study · 132 participants	Very low