Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Population

Intervention or exposure

Comparison

Outcome

Any field or review title

Field or topic

Source

Review versions

1 questions in 1 reviews · intervention: Nutritional supplement · outcome domain: White-spot/initial lesions

current versions

No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 1 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Intervention categories, outcome domains and clusters are a proposed key pending human validation. Clear all filters

Question	Effect	Evidence	Status / GRADE
Calcium fluoride nanoparticle (nCaF2)-containing orthodontic primer vs Conventional primer (Transbond) Enamel demineralization / white spot lesions (DIAGNOdent, photographic scoring) · Patients undergoing fixed orthodontic (fixed appliance) treatment (adolescents and adults, ages 12 to 35) · 1, 3 and 6 months (during treatment to debonding) Can Orthodontic Adhesive Systems Inhibit the Formation and Development of White Spot Lesions During Fixed… (2024)	Al Tuma 2023 (1 split-mouth RCT, 31 patients / 310 teeth): DIAGNOdent scores significantly favored the nCaF2 primer at 1, 3 and 6 months (p=0.000) and S. mutans count differed at 1 month; no significant difference in…	1 study · 31 participants	Ungraded