Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Population

Intervention or exposure

Comparison

Outcome

Any field or review title

Field or topic

Source

Review versions

1 questions in 1 reviews · intervention: Nano-hydroxyapatite · outcome domain: Lesion arrest/remineralization

current versions

No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 1 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Intervention categories, outcome domains and clusters are a proposed key pending human validation. Clear all filters

Question	Effect	Evidence	Status / GRADE
Experimental orthodontic composite containing nano-hydroxyapatite (n-HAP) vs Conventional/control orthodontic adhesive (e.g., Transbond XT) or negative control Superficial surface (enamel) mineralization (surface microhardness) · Human enamel specimens around orthodontic brackets (in vitro) · pH cycling 28 days, Overall Remineralization and anti-demineralization effect of orthodontic adhesives on enamel surrounding orthodontic… (2024)	A study using an orthodontic composite containing nano-hydroxyapatite showed statistically significant remineralization compared with control orthodontic adhesives [34].	1 study	Ungraded