Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

2,079 questions · 2,112 findings · 171 reviews · Eyes and Vision

No studies found 587 · 27.8%GRADE not reported 95 · 4.5%Very low 446 · 21.1%Low 557 · 26.4%Moderate 361 · 17.1%High 66 · 3.1%

Acupuncture vs topical antibiotics

Participants who required surgical incision and drainage after the treatment period or seven days after diagnosis · people with acute hordeolum

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Acupuncture vs topical antibiotics

Participants experiencing the occurrence of a chalazion after the treatment period or seven days after diagnosis · people with acute hordeolum

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Acupuncture vs topical antibiotics

Participants experiencing the recurrence of a hordeolum within six months and one year · people with acute hordeolum

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Acupuncture vs topical antibiotics

Participants with a secondary hordeolum during or after the treatment period and seven days after diagnosis · people with acute hordeolum

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/20 or better · participants aged 18‐60 years with myopia ranging in severity up to 12 diopters (D)

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/20 or better (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/40 or better · participants aged 18‐60 years with myopia ranging in severity up to 12 diopters (D)

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/40 or better (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Proportion of participants who lost two or more lines of best‐corrected visual acuity (BCVA) · participants aged 18‐60 years with myopia ranging in severity up to 12 diopters (D)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Eyes within ± 0.5 D of target refraction · participants aged 18‐60 years with myopia ranging in severity up to 12 diopters (D)

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes eyes within ± 0.5 D of target refraction (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review