Adverse events assessed during catheter dwell · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement
It is very uncertain whether bordered polyurethane changes adverse events assessed during catheter dwell compared with standard polyurethane (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Arterial catheter failureassessed during catheter dwell · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement
It is very uncertain whether standard polyurethane plus sutureless securement devices changes arterial catheter failureassessed during catheter dwell compared with standard polyurethane (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Incidence of catheter‐related bloodstream infection assessed during catheter dwell or 48 hours after removal · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement
1 finding from 1 review
Dislodgement assessed during catheter dwell · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement
It is very uncertain whether standard polyurethane plus sutureless securement devices changes dislodgement assessed during catheter dwell compared with standard polyurethane (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Occlusion assessed during catheter dwell · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement
It is very uncertain whether standard polyurethane plus sutureless securement devices changes occlusion assessed during catheter dwell compared with standard polyurethane (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events assessed during catheter dwell and on product removal · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement
It is very uncertain whether standard polyurethane plus sutureless securement devices changes adverse events assessed during catheter dwell and on product removal compared with standard polyurethane (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Arterial catheter failureassessed during catheter dwell or 48 hours after removal · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement
Integrated securement dressings showed no clear difference in arterial catheter failureassessed during catheter dwell or 48 hours… compared with standard polyurethane (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Incidence of catheter‐related bloodstream infection assessed during catheter dwell or 48 hours after removal · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement
1 finding from 1 review
Dislodgement assessed during catheter dwell · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement
Integrated securement dressings showed no clear difference in dislodgement assessed during catheter dwell compared with standard polyurethane (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Occlusion assessed during catheter dwell · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement
1 finding from 1 review
Incidence of catheter‐related bloodstream infection assessed during catheter dwell or 48 hours after removal · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events assessed during catheter dwell or on product removal · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement
Integrated securement dressings showed no clear difference in adverse events assessed during catheter dwell or on product removal compared with standard polyurethane (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Dislodgement assessed during catheter dwell · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement
It is very uncertain whether standard polyurethane plus tissue adhesive changes dislodgement assessed during catheter dwell compared with standard polyurethane (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Occlusion assessed during catheter dwell · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement
It is very uncertain whether standard polyurethane plus tissue adhesive changes occlusion assessed during catheter dwell compared with standard polyurethane (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events assessed during catheter dwell and on product removal · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement
It is very uncertain whether standard polyurethane plus tissue adhesive changes adverse events assessed during catheter dwell and on product removal compared with standard polyurethane (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Arterial catheter failureassessed during catheter dwell · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement
It is very uncertain whether bordered polyurethane changes arterial catheter failureassessed during catheter dwell compared with standard polyurethane (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Incidence of catheter‐related bloodstream infection assessed during catheter dwell or 48 hours after removal · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement
Bordered polyurethane showed no clear difference in incidence of catheter‐related bloodstream infectionassessed during… compared with standard polyurethane (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Dislodgement assessed during catheter dwell · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement
Bordered polyurethane showed no clear difference in dislodgement assessed during catheter dwell compared with standard polyurethane (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Occlusion assessed during catheter dwell · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement
Bordered polyurethane showed no clear difference in occlusion assessed during catheter dwell compared with standard polyurethane (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Time to reach full sucking feeds (days) · preterm infants
1 finding from 1 review