Density of adult mosquitoes · people at risk of malaria
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
2 participants
Moderate
Density of immature mosquitoes · people at risk of malaria
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
1 participants
Moderate
Malaria parasite prevalence · people at risk of malaria
It is very uncertain whether habitat manipulation changes malaria parasite prevalence compared with no intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.01 [0, 0.16]
2 participants
Very low
EIR · people at risk of malaria
It is very uncertain whether habitat manipulation changes EIR compared with no intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.05 [0, 1.03]
1 participants
Very low
Density of adult mosquitoes · people at risk of malaria
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
2 participants
Low
Density of immature mosquitoes · people at risk of malaria
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
1 study · 3 participants
Low
Malaria parasite prevalence · people at risk of malaria
It is very uncertain whether habitat manipulation with larviciding changes malaria parasite prevalence compared with no intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 0.59 [0.42, 0.83]
1 participants
Very low
Density of adult mosquitoes · people at risk of malaria
1 finding from 1 review
0.49 [0.47, 0.5]
1 participants
Low
Density of immature mosquitoes · people at risk of malaria
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
2 participants
Low
Malaria parasite prevalence · people at risk of malaria
Habitat manipulation and modification with larviciding showed no clear difference in malaria parasite prevalence compared with no intervention (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 0.8 [0.41, 1.55]
1 participants
Moderate
All‐cause mortality · people with suspected malaria
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
7678 participants
Very low
Antimalarial prescribing to microscopy‐ or PCR‐negative people · people with suspected malaria
Malaria rapid diagnostic test (mRDT) probably leads to lower antimalarial prescribing to microscopy‐ or PCR‐negative people compared with clinical diagnosis (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.17 [0.07, 0.4]
7877 participants
Moderate
Composite appropriate treatment · people with suspected malaria
Malaria rapid diagnostic test (mRDT) leads to higher composite appropriate treatment compared with clinical diagnosis (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 3.04 [2.46, 3.74]
9332 participants
High
Number of people receiving an antimalarial · people with suspected malaria
Malaria rapid diagnostic test (mRDT) may leads to lower number of people receiving an antimalarial compared with clinical diagnosis (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.21 [0.14, 0.34]
4729 participants
Low
Antibiotic prescribing to microscopy‐ or PCR‐negative people · people with suspected malaria
Malaria rapid diagnostic test (mRDT) probably leads to higher antibiotic prescribing to microscopy‐ or PCR‐negative people compared with clinical diagnosis (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 2.02 [1.21, 3.37]
5179 participants
Moderate
All‐cause mortality and malaria mortality · people with suspected malaria
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
9428 participants
Low
Hospitalization · people with suspected malaria
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
9428 participants
Low
Clinical failure · adults and children with enteric fever
Cefixime may leads to higher clinical failure compared with fluoroquinolones (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Relapse · children under 18 years of age with enteric fever
It is very uncertain whether ceftriaxone changes relapse compared with azithromycin (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Time to defervescence · children under 18 years of age with enteric fever
Ceftriaxone showed no clear difference in time to defervescence compared with azithromycin (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review