Secondary invasive interventions · intermittent claudication
Endovascular revascularisation plus conservative therapy leads to lower secondary invasive interventions compared with conservative therapy alone (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Disease‐specific quality of life · intermittent claudication
1 finding from 1 review
Pain‐free walking distance · intermittent claudication
2 findings from 1 review
Secondary invasive interventions · intermittent claudication
Endovascular revascularisation showed no clear difference in secondary invasive interventions compared with no specific therapy (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Disease‐specific quality of life · intermittent claudication
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Maximum walking distance · intermittent claudication
2 findings from 1 review
All‐cause mortality during hospital stay · people with critical limb ischaemia
1 finding from 1 review
Reduction in rest pain: rest pain score · people with critical limb ischaemia
1 finding from 1 review
Improvement in lower limb perfusion: ABI · people with critical limb ischaemia
1 finding from 1 review
Improvement in lower limb perfusion: TcO₂ reading in mmHg · people with critical limb ischaemia
1 finding from 1 review
All‐cause mortality during hospital stay · people with critical limb ischaemia
1 finding from 1 review
Rate of amputation · people with critical limb ischaemia
It is very uncertain whether high cell dose changes amputation rate Assessed during in‐patient stay (Losordo 2012) compared with low cell dose (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Ulcer healing · people with critical limb ischaemia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Rest‐pain relief · people with critical limb ischaemia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Improvement in lower limb perfusion: ABI · people with critical limb ischaemia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Improvement in lower limb perfusion: TcO₂ reading in mmHg · people with critical limb ischaemia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
All‐cause mortality during hospital stay · people with critical limb ischaemia
1 finding from 1 review
Rate of amputation · people with critical limb ischaemia
BM‐MNCs showed no clear difference in amputation rate Assessed during in‐patient stay compared with mPBSCs (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Rate of amputation · people with critical limb ischaemia
IM injection showed no clear difference in amputation rate Assessed during in‐patient stay compared with IA injection (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Wound/ulcer healing: number of participants with healing ulcer · people with critical limb ischaemia
IM injection showed no clear difference in wound/ulcer healing: number of participants with healing ulcer compared with IA injection (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review