What do systematic reviews say?

Laparoscopic treatment vs diagnostic laparoscopy

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Laparoscopic treatment vs diagnostic laparoscopy

• Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 39 participants
  Low

Laparoscopic treatment vs diagnostic laparoscopy

• Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 39 participants
  Low

Laparoscopic treatment vs diagnostic laparoscopy

• Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 39 participants
  Low

Laparoscopic treatment vs diagnostic laparoscopy

Laparoscopic treatment probably leads to higher viable intrauterine pregnancy confirmed by ultrasound compared with diagnostic laparoscopy (moderate certainty).

• Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 1.89 [1.25, 2.86]
  3 studies · 528 participants
  Moderate

Laparoscopic treatment vs diagnostic laparoscopy

Laparoscopic treatment showed no clear difference in pregnancy loss: ectopic pregnancy per pregnancy compared with diagnostic laparoscopy (low certainty).

• Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 1.18 [0.1, 13.48]
  1 study · 100 participants
  Low

Laparoscopic treatment vs diagnostic laparoscopy

Laparoscopic treatment showed no clear difference in pregnancy loss: miscarriage per pregnancy compared with diagnostic laparoscopy (low certainty).

• Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 0.94 [0.35, 2.54]
  2 studies · 112 participants
  Low

UAE/UACE vs MTX

UAE/UACE showed no clear difference in treatment success after initial treatment UAE vs systemic MTX compared with systemic MTX (low certainty).

• Interventions for non‐tubal ectopic pregnancy 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1 [0.9, 1.12]
  1 study · 72 participants
  Low

Suction curettage under hysteroscopy vs under ultrasonography

• Interventions for non‐tubal ectopic pregnancy 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 66 participants
  Very low

UAE/UACE vs MTX

UAE/UACE showed no clear difference in complications UAE vs systemic MTX compared with systemic MTX (low certainty).

• Interventions for non‐tubal ectopic pregnancy 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.47 [0.13, 1.75]
  1 study · 72 participants
  Low

UAE/UACE vs MTX

UAE/UACE showed no clear difference in adverse effects UAE vs systemic MTX compared with systemic MTX (low certainty).

• Interventions for non‐tubal ectopic pregnancy 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.58 [0.41, 6.11]
  1 study · 72 participants
  Low

UAE/UACE vs MTX

• Interventions for non‐tubal ectopic pregnancy 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 72 participants
  Moderate

UAE/UACE vs MTX

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for non‐tubal ectopic pregnancy 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Suction curettage under hysteroscopy vs under ultrasonography

It is very uncertain whether suction curettage under hysteroscopy changes treatment success after initial treatment after UAE compared with under ultrasonography (very low certainty).

• Interventions for non‐tubal ectopic pregnancy 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.91 [0.81, 1.03]
  1 study · 66 participants
  Very low

Suction curettage under hysteroscopy vs under ultrasonography

It is very uncertain whether suction curettage under hysteroscopy changes complications after UAE compared with under ultrasonography (very low certainty).

• Interventions for non‐tubal ectopic pregnancy 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 4 [0.47, 33.91]
  1 study · 66 participants
  Very low

Suction curettage under hysteroscopy vs under ultrasonography

It is very uncertain whether suction curettage under hysteroscopy changes adverse effects after UAE compared with under ultrasonography (very low certainty).

• Interventions for non‐tubal ectopic pregnancy 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 3.09 [0.12, 78.7]
  1 study · 66 participants
  Very low

Suction curettage under hysteroscopy vs under ultrasonography

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for non‐tubal ectopic pregnancy 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

LNG‐IUS vs non‐intrauterine progestogen

LNG‐IUS probably leads to higher regression of EH; by length of compared with non‐intrauterine progestogen (moderate certainty).

• Levonorgestrel‐releasing intrauterine system for endometrial hyperplasia 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 2.94 [2.1, 4.13]
  10 studies · 1108 participants
  Moderate
• Levonorgestrel‐releasing intrauterine system for endometrial hyperplasia 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 3.8 [1.75, 8.23]
  1 study · 138 participants
  Low

LNG vs no treatment

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Levonorgestrel‐releasing intrauterine system for endometrial hyperplasia 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

LNG vs no treatment

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Levonorgestrel‐releasing intrauterine system for endometrial hyperplasia 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found