evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,860 questions · 64,864 findings · 4,913 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 13,869 · 21.4%GRADE not reported 3,491 · 5.4%Very low 16,300 · 25.1%Low 17,338 · 26.7%Moderate 10,900 · 16.8%High 2,966 · 4.6%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Standard polyurethane plus tissue adhesive vs standard polyurethane

Arterial catheter failure assessed during catheter dwell · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement

It is very uncertain whether standard polyurethane plus tissue adhesive changes arterial catheter failure assessed during catheter dwell compared with standard polyurethane (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Bordered polyurethane vs standard polyurethane

Adverse events assessed during catheter dwell · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement

It is very uncertain whether bordered polyurethane changes adverse events assessed during catheter dwell compared with standard polyurethane (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Standard polyurethane plus sutureless securement devices vs standard polyurethane

Arterial catheter failureassessed during catheter dwell · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement

It is very uncertain whether standard polyurethane plus sutureless securement devices changes arterial catheter failureassessed during catheter dwell compared with standard polyurethane (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Standard polyurethane plus sutureless securement devices vs standard polyurethane

Dislodgement assessed during catheter dwell · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement

It is very uncertain whether standard polyurethane plus sutureless securement devices changes dislodgement assessed during catheter dwell compared with standard polyurethane (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Standard polyurethane plus sutureless securement devices vs standard polyurethane

Occlusion assessed during catheter dwell · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement

It is very uncertain whether standard polyurethane plus sutureless securement devices changes occlusion assessed during catheter dwell compared with standard polyurethane (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Standard polyurethane plus sutureless securement devices vs standard polyurethane

Adverse events assessed during catheter dwell and on product removal · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement

It is very uncertain whether standard polyurethane plus sutureless securement devices changes adverse events assessed during catheter dwell and on product removal compared with standard polyurethane (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Integrated securement dressings vs standard polyurethane

Arterial catheter failureassessed during catheter dwell or 48 hours after removal · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement

Integrated securement dressings showed no clear difference in arterial catheter failureassessed during catheter dwell or 48 hours… compared with standard polyurethane (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Integrated securement dressings vs standard polyurethane

Dislodgement assessed during catheter dwell · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement

Integrated securement dressings showed no clear difference in dislodgement assessed during catheter dwell compared with standard polyurethane (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Integrated securement dressings vs standard polyurethane

Adverse events assessed during catheter dwell or on product removal · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement

Integrated securement dressings showed no clear difference in adverse events assessed during catheter dwell or on product removal compared with standard polyurethane (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Standard polyurethane plus tissue adhesive vs standard polyurethane

Dislodgement assessed during catheter dwell · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement

It is very uncertain whether standard polyurethane plus tissue adhesive changes dislodgement assessed during catheter dwell compared with standard polyurethane (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Standard polyurethane plus tissue adhesive vs standard polyurethane

Occlusion assessed during catheter dwell · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement

It is very uncertain whether standard polyurethane plus tissue adhesive changes occlusion assessed during catheter dwell compared with standard polyurethane (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Standard polyurethane plus tissue adhesive vs standard polyurethane

Adverse events assessed during catheter dwell and on product removal · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement

It is very uncertain whether standard polyurethane plus tissue adhesive changes adverse events assessed during catheter dwell and on product removal compared with standard polyurethane (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Bordered polyurethane vs standard polyurethane

Arterial catheter failureassessed during catheter dwell · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement

It is very uncertain whether bordered polyurethane changes arterial catheter failureassessed during catheter dwell compared with standard polyurethane (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Bordered polyurethane vs standard polyurethane

Incidence of catheter‐related bloodstream infection assessed during catheter dwell or 48 hours after removal · people with arterial catheter dressing and securement

Bordered polyurethane showed no clear difference in incidence of catheter‐related bloodstream infectionassessed during… compared with standard polyurethane (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review