Summary of findings: Compensative interventions vs control
Falls · stroke survivors with visual field defects
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Findings
What do systematic reviews say?
1,187 questions · 1,248 findings · 108 reviews · Stroke
No studies found 275 · 22%GRADE not reported 56 · 4.5%Very low 269 · 21.6%Low 349 · 28%Moderate 216 · 17.3%High 83 · 6.7%
Summary of findings: Compensative interventions vs control
QoL · stroke survivors with visual field defects
Summary of findings: Compensative interventions may leads to higher quality of life (National Eye Institute Visual Function… compared with control (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- MD 9.36 [3.1, 15.62]2 studies · 96 participantsLow
Summary of findings: Compensative interventions vs control
Scanning ‐ cancellation (cancellation tests ‐ time to complete) After intervention · stroke survivors with visual field defects
Summary of findings: Compensative interventions showed no clear difference in scanning ‐ cancellation (cancellation tests ‐ time to complete)… compared with control (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted2 studies · 97 participantsLow
Summary of findings: Compensative interventions vs control
Adverse events during treatment period · stroke survivors with visual field defects
Summary of findings: Compensative interventions may leads to higher adverse events (number of participants with reported events during… compared with control (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- OR 5.182 studies · 108 participantsLow
Summary of findings: Substitutive interventions vs control
Activities of daily living · stroke survivors with visual field defects
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Substitutive interventions changes functional ability in activities of daily living (Barthel Index)… compared with control (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 39 participantsVery low
Summary of findings: Substitutive interventions vs control
Visual field · stroke survivors with visual field defects
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Substitutive interventions changes visual field (change in visual field area & change in error scores,… compared with control (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- SMD 0.12 [0.44, 1.8]2 studies · 85 participantsVery low
Summary of findings: Substitutive interventions vs control
Extended activities of daily living · stroke survivors with visual field defects
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Substitutive interventions changes extended activities of daily living (Change in EADL from baseline;… compared with control (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- SMD 0.22 studies · 99 participantsVery low
Summary of findings: Substitutive interventions vs control
Reading ability · stroke survivors with visual field defects
Summary of findings: Substitutive interventions showed no clear difference in reading ability compared with control (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- MD 2.81 study · 45 participantsLow
Summary of findings: Restitutive interventions vs control
Visual field · stroke survivors with visual field defects
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Restitutive interventions changes visual field (TAP border position in degrees of visual angle from… compared with control (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- MD 1.021 study · 19 participantsVery low
Summary of findings: Substitutive interventions vs control
Falls · stroke survivors with visual field defects
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Substitutive interventions changes falls (number of falls) After intervention compared with control (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- OR 1.21 [0.26, 5.76]1 study · 39 participantsVery low
Summary of findings: Substitutive interventions vs control
Quality of life (Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ‐25)) After intervention · stroke survivors with visual field defects
Summary of findings: Substitutive interventions showed no clear difference in quality of life (Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ‐25)) After… compared with control (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- MD 8.41 study · 43 participantsLow
Summary of findings: Substitutive interventions vs control
Scanning ‐ cancellation (line cancellation errors) After intervention · stroke survivors with visual field defects
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Substitutive interventions changes scanning ‐ cancellation (line cancellation errors) After intervention compared with control (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- MD 9.8 [1.91, 17.69]1 study · 39 participantsVery low
Summary of findings: Substitutive interventions vs control
Adverse events during treatment period · stroke survivors with visual field defects
Summary of findings: Substitutive interventions may leads to higher adverse events (number of participants with reported events during… compared with control (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- OR 87.32 [4.87, 1564.66]1 study · 59 participantsLow
Summary of findings: Assessment/screening interventions vs control
Functional ability · stroke survivors with visual field defects
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Assessment/screening interventions changes functional ability in activities of daily living (FIM) After… compared with control (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 37 participantsVery low
Summary of findings: Assessment/screening interventions vs control
Visual field · stroke survivors with visual field defects
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Summary of findings: Assessment/screening interventions vs control
Extended activities of daily living · stroke survivors with visual field defects
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Summary of findings: Assessment/screening interventions vs control
Reading ability · stroke survivors with visual field defects
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Summary of findings: Assessment/screening interventions vs control
Falls · stroke survivors with visual field defects
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Summary of findings: Assessment/screening interventions vs control
Quality of life · stroke survivors with visual field defects
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Summary of findings: Restitutive interventions vs control
Extended activities of daily living · stroke survivors with visual field defects
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found